By: Daniel Schulman – 2 years ago The more we learn about how to write software, the more we realise how little we really know about how our code actually works.
In the first part of this series, I took a look at some common pitfalls and some simple strategies to avoid them.
Today, I’ll be looking at some of the common coding mistakes that we see in the real world, as well as some of those that are common in code review.
A quick note on these mistakes The most common mistakes I found in code reviews are: Code duplication : The duplication of code that does not belong in a single source file.
For example, a common problem is the duplication of a list of users that need to be shown in a list.
Sometimes, these duplication issues can be very easily fixed by simply splitting out the user data into multiple files.
But other times, code duplication can cause real issues because of the way the code is written, or because the code does not follow a common naming convention.
If a single file is being used for each user, that means that the code for the entire list will need to run at the same time.
This can be especially annoying if the code looks very different to the code that’s written for each individual user.
If you’re a programmer, you might be tempted to take advantage of some of these features to write your own code that is better suited to a particular task.
But, that is not the case, because a code review will show you exactly what you need to fix and to improve.
In practice, it’s easier to get rid of duplication in a code base by splitting out individual files.
Code duplication is also more likely when you have more than one source file in a file.
This means that you will have to look at the code more carefully before making changes.
Code reuse: It’s common to reuse code that has been written for many different projects and to reuse the same code across multiple different projects.
But you can also create code that will be much more reusable, if it is reused within a single project.
In fact, you can reuse code for all of your projects and still get better performance and better maintainability by writing code that you can use across all of the projects in your project.
For code reuse, you need not be concerned with creating your own source code.
If your code is already available in other projects, you don’t have to worry about it, because they can reuse it.
But it is possible to create reusable code that can be reused across projects, because you can just take the code from the source files that were used for the previous project and reuse it in the new one.
Code coverage: This is the final piece of the puzzle in a review.
When you review a code repository, you should be looking for bugs that you might have missed, and to avoid those you should look for the areas of code where there are code coverage issues.
Code Coverage is often measured by the number of code reviews that have been completed for a particular project.
If there is a lot of code coverage, then the code has been thoroughly reviewed and improved.
If the number is very low, then it may be a very simple case of code duplication.
But if you have very few code reviews and you notice that a few parts of code in your codebase are not being properly documented or documented well, then you need look into the issue in order to see if there are any common mistakes in the code.
I’ve also discussed the problem of duplicate code in this series before, and how you can identify when duplicate code is present in your application.
But now we’ll be going into more detail on how to check if a codebase has been changed and the common ways to deal with that.
Code review is an essential step in the development process.
And a lot can happen in a short time, so it’s important to have a clear understanding of the steps you need done before starting a review to make sure that all the code in the repository is in line with your code style.
The next part of the series: Understanding code reviews In this part of my series, we will be looking into the steps that you need and how to deal on a review in order not to waste time.
I hope that this article helps you better understand how code reviews can be a good way to fix common coding problems, and also what you can do to make the process easier for yourself.
I’ll start with a look into code reviews, followed by a look in to common coding pitfalls, and finally, I will cover some of my tips for writing code review that’s as effective as possible.
The following are some common coding practices that I found to be common in the software review process: Using the same author and/or author name across multiple projects and projects.
This is especially true for code review when the author has multiple projects in a project and has to review multiple code files.
This might be a problem if you are working on several different projects, but